Assembly Republicans, lacking the time or the inclination to act on any serious issues like health care or campaign finance reform, did manage to insult the voters by passing this piece of trash, seeking to shut up voters who want to talk about issues the politicians would rather duck. WISN-TV reports:
Bill Would Curb Municipal Votes On Iraq War, Other Issues
Measure Passed Along Party Lines, 48-44
MADISON, Wis. -- Citizens could no longer force municipal votes on measures calling for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq or other issues under a measure approved by the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Assembly on Tuesday.
The plan would allow cities and villages to refuse to act on citizen initiatives that don't relate to local governmental functions.
Under current law, anyone who gathers enough signatures in support of a proposal can force city councils and village boards to either adopt it or put it to a vote.
Activists used this tactic to force votes on several symbolic anti-war initiatives in 2006 over the opposition of some community leaders.
The Assembly voted 48-44 along party lines to adopt the plan.
But with opposition from Democrats who control the Senate and the governor's office, it is unlikely to become law.
Wisconsin has no initiative system for citizens to pass laws directly. Instead, it allows citizens, if they can collect enough signatures, to give local governments what amounts to an ultimatum: Pass this, or let the voters decide in a referendum.
It's been used most recently on the Iraq war issue, but in the past has also brought forth issues like handgun control and other sticky issues that the politicians would just as soon avoid.
Opponents of the provision claim it's a waste of time and money for local governments to debate on issues that are "none of their business."
Lest we think the war in Iraq has no impact on city budgets, policies or taxes, consider this:
National Priorities Project says Wisconsin taxpayers have already contributed $7.2-billion to the cost of the war, with $1.2-billion coming from Milwaukee County and $635-million from city of Milwaukee taxpayers by the end of 2007.
That amount of money could buy the city of Milwaukee 13,977 public safety officers or 10,582 elementary school teachers for a year, provide health care for 357,054 people, or pay for 4,869 affordable housing units, the project says.
It's clear a suitable topic for public debate, and 62% of the people in the city have already voted for an end to the war.
Why do the Republicans want to shut them up?
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Let's focus on making change and not just noise
I read how people want to be able to vote to bring troops home. I read how Milwaukee money is being wasted by supporting our troop. I read about so many people want to make a differance. Then why is so much time and effort and money being wasted to make a meaningless vote?
Doesn't Milwaukee have enough reall issues to deal with? Murder is out of control. Crime is always spreading and growing more violent. How about one of the worst school systems in the nation? How big of a list do we need to make to demonstrate that this meaningless vote is a monumental waste?
Focus on the some real issues that we can change and need to change. We need a constant effort on these issues. No, They aren't as showey as war and they won't be as easy to make warm and fuzzies, but they are issues that we can make real differance with.
Watching any of the debates you hear change mentioned dozens of times. We are being told that people want change. The let's get off our collective self rightous butts and start holding people accountable with real demands. I want to be proud of the city I live in and say that I live in Milwaukee. I want to know that every kid in these schools have a chance at a real education. I want to be safe walking down the street.
Please start focusing on things that need to be done rather than on things that will simply make you feel happy for the day.
War's not a real issue?
I sure won't argue that we have lots of other problems to deal with, and certainly all of the things you talk about need work.
But if our country was not being bled dry financially by making war, we could afford things like education and police and health care.
But that's not a priority. That's what people like Bill are trying to change.
Steve Hanson
Uppity Wisconsin
It's not meaningless
Or it is only if you think it is. Speaking up once, or voting in one referendum, or writing one letter, or going to one rally isn't going to stop the war. But we've got to keep the pressure on. Some elected officials actually pay attention to what their constituents think. Our Congress member, Gwen Moore, votes to end the war at every opportunity. And she does that knowing she has solid support from the voters of Milwaukee. If every member of Congress represented his/her contituency, the war would be over. Two-thirds of the people want it to end, but telling a pollster that isn't enough. A referendum is just one of many tools to get the message across. We need to use them all.
War is NOT a real issue?
What moron would think that a war is not a real issue?
I can't think of one single event that affects a nation more than a war.
It shows how little respect the conservatives have, of the vets, to claim that war is not an issue....it's tantamount to rebuilding a road in a national park!
The war is the reason the economy is in the tank, we are broke.
Now the neocons want Bushie to bail ou the banks.
I say let them go under, and replace the managements with people who act ethically and refuse to offer predatory products, that will follow the laws ad regulations and run banks as banks.
Allowing voters to voice, should not be limited to just election day. The local governments is the way to make most voices heard.
Whoever voted for this lame bill should be targeted, shamed and tossed from office.
Read the Bill
This bill stems from a court case in Jefferson county where the City of Watertown chose not put an Ira war referendum on the ballot because the Iraq war has no bearing on the city government of watertown, Bill. Of course these topics have an effect on the people of Watertown and the federal taxes they pay, but if the "bring the troops home" referendum were successful, does the City of Watertown have any power to do anything? No.
The judge in the case ruled against the city, but in the transcript made the point that along with the four current exceptions for direct legislation, there should be a fifth to accomodate Watertown's position. He encouraged the legislature to take action - and it did.
This bill only requires that the referdum brought forward must deal with something that the local unit of government actually deals with. While a referendum on the color of Big Bird's tie is of far less serious nature than the Iraq war, it has the same significance to the operation of the local unit of government.
Leave Congress alone?
The legislature frequently passes resolutions "memorializing" Congress to do this, that and the other thing, and those same Republicans who passed this bill vote for them.
Should we just say federal issues are nobody's business but Congress?
By the same token, city councils, town boards, and other local governments often pass items that take positions on state issues. Is that none of their business?
What on earth is wrong with people in a democracy expressing their opinions?
Particularly when the feds are not listening
I'd agree with the idea that the local governments should be concentrating on local values - except that we've reached a point where it is very difficult for normal people to gain influence with their Washington representatives. So if there is going to be any significant change in national politics, I genuinely believe that it is going to have to come from below. We stand some chance of getting the ear of our township and city governments, and even our state leg people.
I KNOW I can have some influence there. Its increasingly difficult to influence the national government ourselves, but we can raise a ruckus at a lower level and making it trickle up. Certainly a national representative is going to start paying attention when every town in his district has voted to end the war.
State and local governments are the labs of government. And local governments have a very deep connection to the federal budget - the reason so many states and local governments are having financial problems is because of the current spending priorities of the feds. There's nothing inappropriate about local governmental bodies expressing an opinion, or letting the people in their area express an opinion. Let's stop telling people that they don't have a right to complain.
Steve Hanson
Cruiskeen Consulting LLC
Uppity Wisconsin
Post new comment