Xoff's Blog

Commentary on state politics by Bill Christofferson, who often uses Xofferson or Xoff to shorten his 14-letter last name.

Christofferson, a recovered journalist and ex-political reporter, has been a Democratic strategist and consultant for 20 years and is now retired. He lives in Milwaukee.
He is the author of a political biography, "The Man From Clear Lake: Earth Day Founder Sen. Gaylord Nelson," published by the University of Wisconsin Press.

Is this what they call bargaining in the state Capitol these days?

This is the "progress" we've been waiting for on the state budget?

Senate Democrats agree to take their Healthy Wisconsin health care plan off the table, replacing it with a package to fund BadgerCare for children with a higher cigaret tax and assessment on hospitals.

And get nothing in return?

WisPolitics reports:

[Dem Leader Sen. Judy] Robson responded that at the very minimum, the Dems will require that all children in the state are covered with health insurance, and all childless families are eligible for BadgerCare. To pay for it, she said, the Dems will insist on the proposed $1.25 per pack cigarette tax increase.

[Republican Assembly Speaker Michael] Huebsch said he will accept their withdrawal of Healthy Wisconsin. "But I am offering you nothing in return," he said.

The last time I recall encountering that kind of attitude at the bargaining table, it led to a bitter strike that lasted two years.

As everyone's been clamoring for the Senate Dems to give up on their creative and far-reaching plan to insure everyone in Wisconsin, was the expectation that they'd just take Healthy Wisconsin, their biggest proposal, out of the budget and expect nothing in return?

State budgets are delicate balancing acts, carefully put together to be able to get majority support in both houses of the legislature. When there is a partisan split between the two houses, it is even harder to walk the tightrope to agreement.

If Senate Dems gave up their biggest item without any understanding about what would happen in return, it is a curious strategic move. And "curious" is a kind adjective.

Despite his public posturing, pretending there would be something wrong with making a deal or "trade" -- which happens all the time -- let's hope Huebsch intends to make some movement on his side of the table, too.

Maybe he feels he doesn't have to, since he somehow duped a number of Assembly Dems, including their alleged leader, into voting to pass one piece of the budget and leave the rest for later.

That's a clever attempt by the GOP to take off the pressure they're feeling from school districts and local governments, who need to know what's coming to them from the state and what they will need to raise locally.

But that pressure is what might actually force some compromise and agreement on a budget. Take away that incentive, and the GOP looks like it would be just as happy if the budget never passed and everything remained frozen at the current level.

Maybe there's some grand Democratic strategy in the Capitol that can't be discerned from 75 miles away.

I hope so, but I highly doubt it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bargaining at the Capitol

What is it with the Democratic party? The national party caves in on the Move-On resolution and it seems the state senate will get nothing from assembly Republicans. If I were leader of the state party I'd have the senators flood the state with details of the intransigence of the Republicans in the assembly. Perhaps the saving grace of the Democratic party on the state level is the good chance of gaining the majority in the assembly in 2008.

Next Session's GOP Plan

Well, using this logic, I propose the following plan for the GOP next session. Propose $15 billion tax cut in their budget(not unlike the ridiculous $15 billion tax increase from the Senate Dems). Then at the conference table, offer to give in on $13 billion of it in exchange for only $2 billion in tax cuts. Since the GOP would be giving in on 87% of their original budget, I assume that the Democrats would give them the other 13% in the spirit of fair bargaining, right? Somehow, I doubt it.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Follow Uppity Wisconsin Lifecasts on Zannel - Text cruiskeen to 58888