Mal Contends

Michael Leon blogs at http://malcontends.blogspot.com. Michael is a writer living in Madison, Wisconsin. His writing has appeared nationally in The Progressive, In These Times, OpEdNews.com, and CounterPunch.

Surveillance Society Comes to Madison

Update: Push for security camera policies in Madison (June 11, 2008)

Now, I feel safer.

Charles Savage at the Boston Globe online writes that the "US doles out millions for street cameras (and that) local efforts raise privacy alarms."

In the last month, cities that have moved forward on plans for surveillance networks financed by the Homeland Security Department include St. Paul, which got a $1.2 million grant for 60 cameras for downtown; Madison, Wis., which is buying a 32-camera network with a $388,000 grant; and Pittsburgh, which is adding 83 cameras to its downtown with a $2.58 million grant.

$388,000? And we want to make a downtown a surveillance zone.

Writes Savage:

The Department of Homeland Security is funneling millions of dollars to local governments nationwide for purchasing high-tech video camera networks, accelerating the rise of a "surveillance society" in which the sense of freedom that stems from being anonymous in public will be lost, privacy rights advocates warn.

Since 2003, the department has handed out some $23 billion in federal grants to local governments for equipment and training to help combat terrorism. Most of the money paid for emergency drills and upgrades to basic items, from radios to fences. But the department also has doled out millions on surveillance cameras, transforming city streets and parks into places under constant observation.

The department will not say how much of its taxpayer-funded grants have gone to cameras. But a Globe search of local newspapers and congressional press releases shows that a large number of new surveillance systems, costing at least tens and probably hundreds of millions of dollars, are being simultaneously installed around the country as part of homeland security grants.

I doubt that I am alone is not trusting any manner of government with this type of Orwellian awareness.

###

Average: 1 (2 votes)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You are way off ... again

The cameras are going specifically to monitor and protect the Madison city waterwells.

 Do your homework please ... thank you.

Hey Moos ... You're Way Off

Do you think that Savage's point that the "... Department of Homeland Security is funneling millions of dollars to local governments nationwide for purchasing high-tech video camera networks, accelerating the rise of a 'surveillance society' in which the sense of freedom that stems from being anonymous in public will be lost ... " still holds?

So, we took $388,000 from the Department of Homeland Security to look at water (and not downtown, as Savage writes) to solve what problem and protect waterwells from what threat? Maybe Arabs eyeing our water?

By the way, how many cameras monitor public places like downtown? Do you think Savage is correct in focusing concern on this issue?

You seem at pains to ignore this issue in Savage's well-considered piece.

###

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.