The tired mantra "experience" thrown around by the Clinton campaign is getting annoying.  How long will her campaign continue to attempt this tactic when already it has every sign that it's working against her.  For those who are still "deliberating" over this non-issue, some points you might want to consider. 

Experience is great but not necessarily "better".  Do you want the "experienced" surgeon or the one who knows what he's doing?  G.W. Bush has SEVEN years "experience", are you reasoning he'd make a better president than Clinton or Obama with that fact ALONE...? 

The fact that Clinton is "still there" after all the political treachery, does not in and of itself PROVE or even have any bearing upon whether Obama can "make it".  She's done it and I credit her for that.  But over-contemplating  Obama's fortitude is allowing the "politics of fear" to override critical observation.  Obama is "THERE" and he has a huge following.  

As far as the Republicans attack during the general election, wouldn't it be more reasonable to assume Clinton has just a few thousand pounds more political baggage than Obama and that that will work against her? 

Clinton refuses to acknowledge her vote for the war was wrong.  Even though we now KNOW it is a war of aggression and approximately 75-80% of Americans want out and have since this campaign started. 

Thankfully, Obama doesn't have a spouse who is galavanting across the country acting like a damn idiot.  Geesh....no one wants Madam President and "Mr lunatic Ex-President" who can't keep his idiotic rants off the front page.  Haven't we had enough LUNACY IN THE PRESIDENCY for a while?  

Another stupid issue that's being tossed out there is this "Obama's too young" thing.  The man is 46, not 25.  This will work in his favor against "bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb, Iran...McCain.